1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2008 BMW 328
To start off, 2008 BMW 328 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW 328, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2008 BMW 328 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | 2200 | 328 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 61 L |