1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2009 Daewoo Kalos
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Kalos. (93 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 76 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Kalos. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Kalos. 2009 Daewoo Kalos has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Daewoo Kalos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2009 Daewoo Kalos | |
Make | Austin | Daewoo |
Model | 2200 | Kalos |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 77.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 176 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 45 L |