1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2010 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2010 GMC Canyon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Canyon (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2010 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Austin | GMC |
Model | 2200 | Canyon |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 72 L |