1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2011 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2011 Nissan NP300 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Austin 2200. (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 2011 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 2200. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 2200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 2200 | 2011 Nissan NP300 | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 2200 | NP300 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 16.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 75 L |
