1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2012 Nissan Versa

To start off, 2012 Nissan Versa is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Versa. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Versa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2012 Nissan Versa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Versa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 2200 (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Versa. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 2200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Versa.

Compare all specifications: