1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 1972 Austin 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | 2200 | C30 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 60 L |