1972 Austin 2200 vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 2200 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin 2200 has manual transmission. 1972 Austin 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 2200 | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | 2200 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2227 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1181 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 70 L |