1972 Austin Allegro vs. 1952 Holden FX

To start off, 1972 Austin Allegro is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin Allegro (57 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 140 kg more than 1972 Austin Allegro.

Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (93 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Austin Allegro 1952 Holden FX
Make Austin Holden
Model Allegro FX
Year Released 1972 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 2166 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 57 HP 51 HP
Torque 93 Nm 136 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 830 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2620 mm