1972 Austin Allegro vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1972 Austin Allegro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,485 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin Allegro (68 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin Allegro should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin Allegro weights approximately 90 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin Allegro (104 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1972 Austin Allegro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Allegro | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Austin | Triumph |
| Model | Allegro | Herald |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1485 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 29 L |
