1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1972 Austin Allegro. (68 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 338 kg more than 1972 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (104 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Allegro | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Allegro | Equator |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1485 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3260 mm |
