1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,485 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin Allegro weights approximately 160 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin Allegro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Allegro | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Allegro | Minica |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1485 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |
