1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1972 Austin Allegro. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 470 kg more than 1972 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Allegro | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Allegro | Tracker |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 61 L |