1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2009 Buick Lucerne
To start off, 2009 Buick Lucerne is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,879 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Buick Lucerne (224 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1972 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Buick Lucerne (237 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Buick Lucerne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro. 2009 Buick Lucerne has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Buick Lucerne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Allegro | 2009 Buick Lucerne | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | Allegro | Lucerne |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3879 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |