1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1972 Austin Allegro. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 745 kg more than 1972 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Allegro | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Austin | Kia |
Model | Allegro | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2845 mm |