1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1972 Austin Allegro. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (104 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Allegro | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Allegro | Commodore |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |