1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 287 more horse power than 1972 Austin Allegro. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Because 2012 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (93 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Allegro | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Allegro | Caprice |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |