1972 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1819 kg more than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 627 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (93 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Allegro | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Austin | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Allegro | Phantom |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 2649 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5842 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1638 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 100 L |