1972 Austin Marina vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1972 Austin Marina is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 914 kg more than 1972 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Marina | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Marina | 60 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 5672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3230 mm |
