1972 Austin Marina vs. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Marina. (145 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Marina | 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Marina | Camaro |
Year Released | 1972 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2580 mm |