1972 Austin Marina vs. 1989 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1989 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 265 kg more than 1972 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Marina | 1989 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | Marina | Sundance |
Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |