1972 Austin Marina vs. 1994 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1994 Toyota Camry is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,163 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Toyota Camry has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Marina has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Marina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Toyota Camry will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Marina | 1994 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Marina | Camry |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2163 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
