1972 Austin Marina vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (176 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina.
Because 1972 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Marina has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Marina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Marina | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Austin | Acura |
Model | Marina | TL |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1273 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2840 mm |