1972 Austin Marina vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna

To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,971 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 545 kg more than 1972 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Marina. (145 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Marina. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Marina has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Marina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: