1972 Austin Marina vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 560 kg more than 1972 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Marina. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Marina | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Marina | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.8 mm | 100 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |
