1972 Austin Marina vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1972 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Marina. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Marina | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Marina | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
