1972 Austin Marina vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla

To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Marina would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin Marina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Corolla (194 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1972 Austin Marina. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 30 kg more than 1972 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Corolla (260 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Marina. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Marina.

Compare all specifications: