1972 Austin Maxi vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 1972 Austin Maxi is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 235 kg more than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Maxi | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | Austin | Riley |
Model | Maxi | RM A |
Year Released | 1972 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2870 mm |