1972 Austin Maxi vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1972 Austin Maxi is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin Maxi (95 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 85 kg more than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin Maxi (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1972 Austin Maxi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Maxi | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Cedric |
Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |