1972 Austin Maxi vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (98 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1972 Austin Maxi. (95 HP @ 5350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin Maxi weights approximately 95 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin Maxi (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (131 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Austin Maxi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Maxi | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | Maxi | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |
