1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2001 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2001 Nissan Cima is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Cima weights approximately 770 kg more than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Because 2001 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Maxi | 2001 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Cima |
Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1500 mm |