1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1972 Austin Maxi. (95 HP @ 5350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 800 kg more than 1972 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Maxi. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Maxi | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Maxi | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 78 L |