1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,748 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin Maxi (95 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin Maxi (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 2. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Austin Maxi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Maxi | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Maxi | 2 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 45 L |