1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 446 kg more than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Maxi. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Maxi | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Maxi | Condor |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |