1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2010 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1972 Austin Maxi. (95 HP @ 5350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Maxi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 704 kg more than 1972 Austin Maxi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Maxi. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Maxi. 2010 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Austin Maxi 2010 Ford Falcon
Make Austin Ford
Model Maxi Falcon
Year Released 1972 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1748 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 95 HP 362 HP
Engine RPM 5350 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 533 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1000 kg 1704 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 68 L