1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1972 Austin Maxi. (95 HP @ 5350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Maxi. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Maxi | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Maxi | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 74 L |
