1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1972 Austin Maxi. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin Maxi | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | Maxi | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1748 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 187 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4884 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 80 L |
