1972 Austin Maxi vs. 2011 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2011 Nissan Titan is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 5,598 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Titan (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1972 Austin Maxi. (68 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin Maxi.
Because 2011 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Titan (385 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Maxi. (104 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Maxi. 2011 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1972 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1972 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin Maxi | 2011 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Titan |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1485 cc | 5598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 313 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 385 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2030 mm |