1972 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1972 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1972 Autobianchi A 112. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1972 Autobianchi A 112. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1149 kg more than 1972 Autobianchi A 112. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Autobianchi A 112 | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | 60 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 5672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3230 mm |
