1972 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 899 kg more than 1972 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Autobianchi A 112 | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mercury |
| Model | A 112 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1574 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |
