1972 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1735 kg more than 1972 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Autobianchi A 112. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Autobianchi A 112 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Jeep |
| Model | A 112 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 2987 cc |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 2410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2790 mm |
