1972 Bizzarrini Manta vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3

To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,352 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Bizzarrini Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3.

Because 1972 Bizzarrini Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Bizzarrini Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1972 Bizzarrini Manta has manual transmission. 1972 Bizzarrini Manta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: