1972 Bizzarrini Manta vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,352 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Bizzarrini Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Bizzarrini Manta | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Cadillac |
Model | Manta | CTS |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5352 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2890 mm |