1972 Bizzarrini Manta vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,352 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Bizzarrini Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-V. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Because 1972 Bizzarrini Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Bizzarrini Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1972 Bizzarrini Manta has manual transmission. 1972 Bizzarrini Manta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Bizzarrini Manta | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Honda |
Model | Manta | CR-V |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5352 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1644 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2620 mm |