1972 BMW 2002 vs. 2013 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2013 Ford Fusion is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Fusion (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1972 BMW 2002. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Fusion weights approximately 520 kg more than 1972 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Fusion (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 2002. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW 2002 | 2013 Ford Fusion | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2002 | Fusion |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4869 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 63 L |