1972 BMW 3 vs. 2000 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 3 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 BMW 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 BMW 3 (201 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 BMW 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 BMW 3 weights approximately 76 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 BMW 3 (271 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 1972 BMW 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1972 BMW 3 2000 Ford Ranger
Make BMW Ford
Model 3 Ranger
Year Released 1972 2000
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2986 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 201 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 250 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1374 kg 1298 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2800 mm