1972 BMW 3 vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 3 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 BMW 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1972 BMW 3. (201 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 171 kg more than 1972 BMW 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 3. (271 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 3. 2003 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1972 BMW 3 has manual transmission. 1972 BMW 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1972 BMW 3 2003 Jaguar XJ
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 3 XJ
Year Released 1972 2003
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2986 cc 2968 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 201 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 293 Nm
Torque RPM 3700 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1374 kg 1545 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 3040 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]