1972 BMW 3 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 3 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1972 BMW 3. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1152 kg more than 1972 BMW 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 3. (272 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 3.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW 3 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 3 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3003 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |