1972 BMW 520 vs. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1972 BMW 520 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 705 kg more than 1972 BMW 520.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 BMW 520 | 1971 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 520 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 211 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 107 L |
