1972 BMW 520 vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW
To start off, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 6,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (395 HP @ 5160 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1972 BMW 520. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 BMW 520 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (600 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW 520 | 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW | |
Make | BMW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 520 | CW |
Year Released | 1972 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5160 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 600 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1120 mm |