1972 BMW 520 vs. 1999 De Tomaso Bigua
To start off, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 BMW 520 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 De Tomaso Bigua is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua (302 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1972 BMW 520. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua should accelerate faster than 1972 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 BMW 520 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1999 De Tomaso Bigua.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua (407 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1999 De Tomaso Bigua will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1972 BMW 520 | 1999 De Tomaso Bigua | |
Make | BMW | De Tomaso |
Model | 520 | Bigua |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |